What did the President know and when did he know it? (2/17/13, not in CCTimes)

Posted on February 17, 2013 
Filed Under National, Stories Ignored by CCTimes | 1 Comment

Liberals like Hillary used to ask what President Bush knew and when did he know it about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. And of course liberal newspapers like the Contra Costa Times would parrot that question.

Four Americans working for the current administration are murdered in Benghazi, Libya, and you will NOT find this question in the CCTimes. Former Defense Secretary Panetta has admitted that he only spoke with President Obama ONCE on the night of the murder and the liberal Contra Costa Times does not feel this is a question worth asking.


Texas judge rules against Planned Parenthood (1/1/13, page A4)

Posted on January 1, 2013 
Filed Under National | Leave a Comment

Chris Tomlinson, AP

Liberals have this racist commitment to terminating as many pregnancies of poor women (read: black and Hispanic) as possible no matter what.

The State of Texas, on the other hand, has said enough to this racist policy but writer Tomlinson doesn’t see it that way and writes his little hit piece in a subtle way to reflect how these “poor” women will be restricted from seeing “their” doctor. For any of you that have Kaiser or some other HMO, how many of you really have your own doctor? Neither do these women.

Planned Parenthood needs to adjust to state law or completely drop state funding so they can continue their abortion policies.

Report: Benghazi talking points rewritten by intelligence agencies (1/1/13, page A4)

Posted on January 1, 2013 
Filed Under International | Leave a Comment

Larry Margasak, AP

So the FBI, CIA and other intelligence agencies – BUT NOT THE WHITE HOUSE – made changes to talking points used by the President of the United States, the Secretary of State and the UN ambassador.

But who appointed the heads of the FBI, CIA and “other intelligence agencies?”

More importantly, why wouldn’t the president, whom we assume was taking the 3AM phone call, not correct the mistakes in these talking points?

Well, if we wait for liberal reporters like Margasak to ask then we’ll never know.

It’s a deal, but no vote yet (1/1/13, Front Page)

Posted on January 1, 2013 
Filed Under National | Leave a Comment

Jonathan Weisman, NYTimes

Note the bulk of the story deal with higher taxes. Yet if you’re smart enough to add it up (which immediately eliminates Weisman and the CCTimes editors) you’ll notice that it doesn’t reduce the deficit and in fact with make it worse.

So President Obama’s promise to reduce the deficit by half in his first four years turns out to be a lie that journalists are just to stupid to figure out.

GOP lost a new bloc: Bay Area tech pros (12/23/12, Front Page)

Posted on December 23, 2012 
Filed Under California | Leave a Comment

Josh Richman, CCTimes

Alternate Headline:  GOP gains a new bloc: Bay Area venture capitalists.

But when you’re a liberal newspaper THIS NEVER OCCURS TO YOU!

What will it take? (12/23/12, Front Page)

Posted on December 23, 2012 
Filed Under National | Leave a Comment

Mark Emmons, San Jose Mercury News

This headline is full of the usual liberal bias. The assumption, and we emphasis the word “assumption”, that making gun ownership more difficult will prevent these types of tragedies from occurring is just dim-witted at best.

Liberal’s ALWAYS like the shallow solution. In this case they ignorantly believe that gun control will automatically work. Yet ask the kids that live in Chicago or Oakland if the strict gun control laws in those cities/states have kept them safe.

On another note, this entire article is racists. Why hasn’t the Contra Costa Times spent this much column space on the black kids being murdered by illegal guns in Richmond and Oakland? Is it because the kids are black and the staff at the CCTimes is white? We think so.

Carbon cap (12/2/12, page E1)

Posted on December 2, 2012 
Filed Under California, Global Warming | Leave a Comment

Dana Hull, San Jose Mercury News

See this picture below and read the explanation under number 3.

It’s not clear who the clueless dork was that wrote it, but they forgot the other option: Leave the state and take their manufacturing jobs with them.

Now read #4 and think about this: If Sacramento makes money, who is giving them that money? Only a poorly educated journalist would think that it’s the oil refiners, power plants and large factories. In real life, it’s you.

keep looking »